|
|
Mills and the Textile
Industry

Crank Mill
|
Domestic
cloth
trade

|
|
By the 17th and 18th centuries, the combination of
land enclosure for sheep farming providing an abundance of wool,
larger farm holdings requiring limited opportunities for agricultural
employment, and yet a growing population, resulted in more and more
people turning to hand loom weaving within their own homes; hence the
development of the domestic cloth trade. Amongst the early clothiers
were the families of the Dixons, Asquiths, Barrons, Bradleys, Crowthers,
Websters, Garnetts, Smiths, Scarths, Watsons, Jacksons - names to be
long associated with the district.
|
|
The
beginning
of
factories
|
|
In the 18th century, machinery and power became
increasingly sought. Watermills like at Howley (powered by Howley Beck)
were converted from corn milling to textile processes, the village's old
windmill converted to a scribbling mill and subsequently the erection of
a water-powered scribbling mill (powered by Morley Beck) down in the
Valley. At the same time buildings were being developed to
accommodate a number of hand looms together, so commencing the early
factory system, i.e the coming together of men, women and children to
work in company for an employer. Horse power (the "horse-gin")
was also tried within the district.
|
|
The
Industrial Revolution

|
|
More significantly, steam power was being developed.
In 1790 the Crank Mill
in Station Road was built at the behest of the Websters by the Lord of
the Manor, the Earl of Dartmouth. Initially a scribbling mill powered by
a 20 h.p steam engine, Rods
Mill was erected in 1799 by Isaac Crowther, and in 1834 Gillroyd Mill was erected
by a consortium of clothiers to be run on a co-operative basis.
Notwithstanding certain opposition, both locally and nationally, the
factory system was becoming firmly established.
|
|
Development
of mungo/shoddy
|
|
1838 saw possibly the greatest development for the
district, the introduction of mungo/ shoddy pioneered by the Parr
brothers of Parr's Mill, Howley
Lower; this being a material produced by grinding up woollen cloths
which were composed of tailor's clippings, old clothing and rags. It was
found to be a suitable material for blending with new virgin wool.
"Union " cloth of cotton warp and reclaimed mungo/shoddy weft
was found to be both serviceable and cheap. It became the staple product
of the district and clothed armies, navies, police forces, children and
many others throughout the world.
|
|
Labour
reforms

|
|
During the 19th century various reforms were
introduced which greatly improved the conditions of workers in factories
and mines. In particular, an Act in 1833 excluded children under 9 from
factories, while older children were given increased rights, and
inspectors were introduced to enforce the regulations. The Factory Act
of 1850 again reformed the working hours and conditions of women and
children, and the 1864 Act paid attention to working conditions within
the factories. In effect, all through the Victorian age these and
similar reforms led to a revolution in the uneasy relationship between
Labour and Capital which continues to this day.
|
|
Rapid
growth
|
|
Further development was rapid. Plentiful supplies of
locally obtained coal and quarried stone, together with the coming of
the railways, permitted the onset of substantial prosperity for the
trade and the district generally. Rag sorting and rag grinding
warehouses and factories were built. By 1866 there were more than 20
mills, by 1876 there were 27, and at the height there were over 30,
details of which are available through the links on this page.
|
|
Safety
concerns
|
|
The mills were particularly susceptible to fire, and
one of the worst accidents in the town's history occurred in 1863. Nine
people were killed when a boiler at the Hembrigg Mill exploded with resulting fire damage,
and other similar if smaller scale incidents caused great public
distress in the 1860s and 70s. It became increasingly difficult to
insure the mills, and this led to the formation of what would become Morley Fire Service.
|
|
An
industry
in
decline
|
|
The district (together with Dewsbury and Batley)
indeed became the centre of the "shoddy trade". It
continued well into the 20th century, demand being particularly
substantial during both World Wars. Its decline, however,
commenced in the 1960's. The reasons were:
|
|

|
|
-
The introduction of man-made fibres presented difficult and costly
challenges to extract the same from rags
-
Fashionable trends requiring better and more sophisticated
clothing material
-
Local mills historically being relatively small manufacturing
units run by private capital, their buildings and machinery
unsuitable for mass production
- Difficulties experienced with labour recruitment
-
Fierce competition from manufacturers abroad where labour and
other overheads were much less expensive.
|
|
The
end
of
an era
|
|
Great efforts were made by a number of mill owners to
continue in production as long as they could, but by the end of the 20th
century the textile trade within the district had become virtually
non-existent.
|
|
|
|